Mathfest paper removal.

I have pulled my presentation from the web and will have my web master put it up on Sand Box Geometry.com web site for $25 per printed PowerPoint/Word Journal, with $6 shipping and handling, for a total cost of $31. I am retired and not being a member of education and research have no grants or research funding to sustain my parametric geometry company. I promise an expository geometry of curved space that will be classical.

I intend to to travel to Champaign Illinois this October to attend Wolfram Technology Conference. I have submitted an abstract on parametric geometry of natural field energy curves. It will begin with g-field unit circle/parabola CSDA gravity field orbital. From this I will develop the concept of a unity ratio of position and energy curves. From this I intend to conclude a conic description of white light composition and the driving energy behind wave form phenomena energy and frequency constructing light waves using parametric plane geometry. God Bless America, Alexander

Posted in Properties of Central Relative Gravity Curves | Leave a comment

upcoming mathfest paper

POWERPOINT SLIDE AND NOTE MATH FEST 2011 I will be posting my PowerPoint presentation. It’s plane geometry as never ever before. Alexander

Posted in Properties of Central Relative Gravity Curves | Leave a comment

Lexington Mathfest

It has been awhile since I posted a piece. I have been working on a paper for presentation at Mathfest 2011 in Lexington Kentucky, August 5 Friday morning. I intend to post my PowerPoint presentation on my sandboxgeometry.com web site. I love Geometry and truly a picture is worth a thousand words as 18 years of labor is being rolled into a ten minute time slot. It’ll be great stuff.

Posted in Properties of Central Relative Gravity Curves | Leave a comment

Unified Field Geometry

Making great progress on unified field geometry. Don’t know if the world is ready for it yet. Instead of looking for a single equation to define the four forces I search curves to reference forces needed to hold atomic level shapes of stable elements. My reference frame will be the same as a CSDA gravity field orbital, a standard reference for all elements and their structure; from the electron cloud to nuclear center. Looks cool! I really need feed back from the world out there. I am considering upload of my Data Analysis records from Go-Daddy and demonstrate a lot of international activity but no response (yet). I am entertaining thoughts on field forces operating in the center of the sun and may post them and invite discourse on how mass centers remain so hot. I believe there are two types. liquid molten as our earth and super hot nuclear centers such as our sun. One is liquid (planet class) and one is stellar (a gas). Does our moon have a molten center? Anyone out there?  Later; Alexander

Posted in Properties of Central Relative Gravity Curves | Leave a comment

New Stuff

 

 

unit square space time changing accelerationBeen busy with constructing new main web site (sandboxgeometry.com). Needed some help from professional developer. Now it is one year and I had hoped to be further along with CSDA (sandbox geometry Curved Space Division Assembly) instilling genuine interest and reaction in the disciplines of math and science, lotsa’ lookers but no takers.

Being a man of modest means I intend to “float” two articals (on the new web site) I have written for purchase. Gots to pay the bills as we all must do!

The first artical will be my withdrawn patent submission paper concerning a CSDA. I wrote this artical as an exposition of what these two curves can do when working together! First piece has to do with Euclids perendicular divisor and using a division of magnitude to partition said magnitude into (n) parts and even futher ; into (1/n) parts. These methods led me to the first ever geometry explanation of tensors. Activity two will use a CSDA to construct any root of magnitude (magnitude^(1/n)). Activity three explores duo curvature a parabola posesses to analyze both traditional differential position curvature as well as changing energy curves of loci position on a RELATIVE TANGENT. Methods four and five develope function analyses of energy curves and five deals with Apollonius section parabola linkage to a Sandbox Geometry Unit Parabola.

This paper is so solid with ideas and modeling and originality that it will be a sought after companion and teaching aid designed to work in tangent (pun intended) with any and every (pre-calc and calc) math lesson plan.

But this is not what this blog is about. I had promised a piece on the secong part of plane geometry function of energy curves (RELATIVE TANGENT) and that is what I am going to write about. Alexander

Posted in Properties of Central Relative Gravity Curves | Leave a comment

Things and Change

<script type=”text/javascript”>

var _gaq = _gaq || [];   _gaq.push([‘_setAccount’, ‘UA-37993509-1’]);   _gaq.push([‘_setDomainName’, ‘sandboxgeometry.info’]);   _gaq.push([‘_trackPageview’]);

(function() {     var ga = document.createElement(‘script’); ga.type = ‘text/javascript’; ga.async = true;     ga.src = (‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https://ssl’ : ‘http://www’) + ‘.google-analytics.com/ga.js’;     var s = document.getElementsByTagName(‘script’)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);   })();

</script>

Just returned from Italy where I visited Basilica of Angels Saints and Martyrs. A ancient Roman Bath House converted to a beautiful apology by the Church to Galileo. Also visited his grave in Florence.

Did you know that Galileo refused to accept Kepler’s findings to correct the difficulty needed to represent a planetary orbit with plane geometry. He discounted an ellipse as a representative path of orbit for our planet group because God would never chose such a complicated curve to work the mechanics of his creation.

The year Galileo died sir Isaac Newton was born on Christmas Day 1642. We know his history and understandably he is my inspiration and boyhood idol. He proved explicitly Kepler’s empirical laws of equal area per orbit time. Gauss went even further pursuing the taming of these complicated curves with heavy calculus and elliptical integrals.

I will spend next year showing Galileo was right.

After all, a central force has one center and focus, two plane geometry objects charged with different meaning that needs to be melded into one in order to see the beautiful mechanical energy curves of God.

MERRY CHRISTMAS; Alexander CEO SAND BOX GEOMETRY LLC

Posted in Properties of Central Relative Gravity Curves | Leave a comment

parametric introduction to a Unit Parabola

 

 

info scriptDefining a Plane Geometry UNIT PARABOLA

Posted in Properties of Central Relative Gravity Curves | Leave a comment