Not So Plain Geometry

Hello world; I have launched my private journal within my website sandboxgeometry.org. I post 4 papers that will cover initial space curve exploration using parametric geometry exploration I have collected over the last 25 years. These four papers are essential to construct and use a CURVED SPACE DIVISION ASSEMBLY a plane geometry tool I invented to bring traditional linear analytics to vector energy properties of space curves. Basically, a means to construct plane geometry function capability to move between kinetic energy of planetary motion and momentum.

My first paper is up and I will inform SANDBOXGEOMETRY readers as I post these papers in chronological order of presentation.

Alexander

What is available on my sites for read and download is now 2 years old. I am retired and will accept speaking engagements on newest application and utility of CSDA analytic geometry concerning central force field phenomena. Send request for information to my web site and I will return fee and requirement information. Alexander

I am fortunate to be given the opportunity of a ‘Contributed Paper Session’. Means another 5 minutes beyond ‘General Paper Session’.

JMM 2014 abstract submission

I hope to meet like minded people there having same education goals

JMM 2014 BookProposal

I will honor all requests for Word Document showing slide deck and explanatory sent to me at alexander@sandboxgeometry.com

alexander

Wolfram is not interested at this time in a joint venture for entry level dedicated math teaching course for 8th and 10th grade young people. I post my letter. Hope one day to hook up with someone with finances to help get this (Curved Space Division Assembly) off the ground.

My end pursuit is about a Plane Geometry Unified Field Description. Got the g-field down, and start for strong and weak nuclear (study of joining two and only two atoms). This progress I will not share on the net! This is to be my bread and butter.

Professor Einstein presented Special Relativity 1905 and General Relativity 1915. A lot has changed in our world since then, but not these guys (relativity). My presentation on fields is for the general interest public (think Popular Science and Mechanics). The professor spent his remaining days searching for a Unified Field Theory. I can’t handle heavy math and instead like to draw picture using parametric geometry to study force application using lines. Much as an 8th grade fulcrum problem. Hence I pursue a Unified Field Geometry.

Hope to see and talk with someone at JMM 2014. I’m movin’ on up and for first time will talk in a contributed paper session (15 minutes). I post abstract and acceptance.

Adrianna and Jared  JMM 2014 abstract submission

COPYRIGHT ORIGINAL GEOMETRY BY Alexander:

Sand Box Geometry LLC, a company dedicated to utility of Ancient Greek Geometry in pursuing exploration and discovery of 21st century central force field curves.

Didn’t meet any one at Hartford. Maybe in Champaign some one will say hello. If not there then please do so at JMM meet in Baltimore January 2014. I will talk the same stuff at both events. This abstract is turning out to be my favorite subject. Galileo and his circular g-field energy curves as opposed to Kepler elliptical orbit curves. I post my Tech Conference abstract and tentative JMM schedule. Someone please say hello!

Abstract for Mathematica tech conference Oct 2013

JMM meet Jan2013

Presenting another paper. This time I will talk about plane geometry division. I feel it will bring an explanation to a 9th grade question I entertained many, many years ago. My first geometry course was 9th grade. I hated it. However Euclid did get one construction into my head which I never forgot. How to construct a perpendicular divisor at midpoint of a line.

I could see using a Cartesian system to erect a rectangle or square for a multiplication table. I could see addition of one line to another. I could see subtraction of one line from another. I could not see division of a line by integer where result will be equal distribution so parts sum the whole without remainder. But the worst HS problem my young mind wrestled with was I could not see what and how to use plane geometry to construct a ‘inverse square’ property.

Once I got past problematic improvements on Euclid’s divisor, I embraced the beauty of ‘inverse square’ plane geometry constructions. I post my My schedule mathfest 2013 Hartford schedule. Again, I hope to meet someone there who may or may not have the same interest I pursue.

COPYRIGHT ORIGINAL GEOMETRY BY Alexander:

Sand Box Geometry LLC, a company dedicated to utility of Ancient Greek Geometry in pursuing exploration and discovery of Central Force Field Curves.

Spent January of 2013 in mixed emotional analysis of San Diego trip. Lotsa mathematicians’ all doin the same thing they do every year and I don’t understand a lot of it but talkin can be fun and interesting. I should point out I am not a math person. I love plane geometry and a few theorems there from. Mainly Thales (utility of right triangle on a diameter) and Pythagoras. I use ancient geometry constructions and a few terms from calculus, mainly slope, which has always been used in HS physics to find instantaneous velocity, as introductory analysis of energy curves.

Its the energy curves I live for. I am the first (best of MY knowledge) to develop and utilize a Unit Parabola (dependent curve) analytics to capture graphing methods of an active gravity field evaluating motive energy curves of M2 and fixed potential curves of M1.

I offer two quantifiers to substantiate the previous paragraph.

1. Find anywhere a definition of Unit Parabola as dependent curve to a plane geometry Unit Circle independent curve. I use these two guys to study curved space using curves, a little easier then square space analysis of field properties (which seems to be curves… parabola motion in the g-field, coalesced mass of planets, moons, and stars). Once we have a dependent item paired with an independent item, both out of the curves corral, we can entertain simple calculus to find relative energy levels of changing g-field motion.

2. Google ‘duo curvature of a unit parabola’ and see a solid claim on ‘Prior Art’ using such concepts of curve analysis to make separate simple scalar properties of curves and lines  from complex energy curves and vectors.

I consumed February to move my web sites. Now that I am set up on my new server I intend to review my posts, most are 18 months untouched. And a lot has come to me since March of 2012.

I am becoming disenfranchised, maybe even resentful, with Math conventions and their ongoing search to improve the education vehicle we drive. I am loaded with ideas, but due to my all important CV, will never be invited to sit at their table.  Alexander

I will present a paper at upcoming JMM. It  covers finding the focus of an Apollonian Section Parabola. When I read in Sir Thomas Heath’s ‘History of Greek Math’ that Apollonius never mentioned the parabola section focus, I just had to go and find it. It definitely helps explain the phenomena of a unit parabola ability to track changing diameter curvature of a cone.

Most of the posts on this site are already better then a year old. I am holding back on most recent discoveries and have not published their utility as I use said utility exploring two of Natures fields. With Gods help, I have succeeded in imagining shape of energy curves structuring Gravity and Strong Nuclear. I post my JMM schedule and hope to meet some of you in San Diego. For now, Alexander

MY SCHEDULE FOR SAN DIEGO

It has been quite some time since I have visited my blog. Been very busy networking with Mathematica, trying to garner interest into new easier methods to teach math. If we study curved space field phenomena of gravity with two simple curves the field geography of gravity is made available for study and analysis using basic simple math. I have worked for pretty near 20 years on my CSDA (Curved Space Division Assembly) to study and construct the g-field. The 4 most important introductory papers are available for free on my web site, Sand Box Geometry. I am retired, my CV is 20 years working (self employed dry cleaner), and the erudite professional working the field (education and math) can’t believe the source. The parametric geometry is never challenged, it is correct, right, and simple beyond belief. Its the source, me, that must be the impediment preventing breaking the glass ceiling. Since I have retired I have completed the whole standard model for the gravity field even to using Sir Isaac Newton’s inverse square law to shape motive and potential energy curves. Enough for now, I promise to write more when I return from a short trip. I also post a claim to intellectual copyright. I have no knowledge of the extent of the base structuring human knowledge, and will address any claim I might have made in error.  For now, God Bless all human kind, and please smooth the surrounding disturbing waves of cultural conflict. Alex

CLAIM TO INTELECTUAL COPYRIGH1

Been awhile since I have posted happenings. Still no contact from anyone in the world. Lots of visits from China, Russia, Ames Research Laboratory in California and so on. Will attend Wolfram Organization Tech Conference October 19. Will make a 5 minute presentation of constructing a Apollonian Parabola Section on to the surface of a cone. Have also submitted an abstract For 2012 Joint Math Meeting in Boston this coming January. Hope to speak about dual foci’s of a section parabola in contributed papers session. I may post some of these methods after each session (Wolfram and JMM). Please God Bless Our World with some peace and security. Alexander